Most downloads are available at Mark Turner's SSRN author page.



The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. 2014. New York: Oxford University Press. Paperback edition. Kindle edition.

BBC Radio Interview, 31 January 2014.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio Interview. 7 May 2014.
Brain World Magazine Interview. Spring 2014.
The New Scientist piece in "The Big Idea" section. February 2014.
Psychology Today review. April 2014.

"Turner makes a cogent and often colorfully argued case for blending’s importance as crucial to the development of new ideas and imaginative works." —Publisher's Weekly.

Why are we so innovative? Where do new ideas come from? Why are human beings so exceptionally good at innovation, leaving other species mentally in the dust? How can we hold onto new ideas once they are formed? This book explores the claim that the human spark, the source of innovation and the origin of ideas, was an advance that occurred in a particular kind of mental operation, which Turner calls “blending.”

Table of Contents: 1. The Human Spark. 2. Catch a Fire. 3. The Idea of You. 4. The Idea of I. 5. Forbidden Ideas. 6. Artful Ideas. 7. Vast Ideas. 8. Tight Ideas. 9. Recurring Ideas. 10. Future Ideas. Appendix: The Academic Workbench. Notes. References.

View the book talk

مدخل في نظريّة المزج

Elements of Blending.  2013.  Edited with a parallel Arabic translation by Lazhar Zanned.  Manouba, Tunisia: University of Manouba Press.  ISBN 978-9973-085-27-6. Download.

This work presents lectures delivered by Mark Turner at the University of Manouba, Tunisia, during November, 2010, translated into Arabic by Professor Lazhar Zanned. Introduction: Origins and Goals of Blending Theory. Part One: Introduction to Blending. Part Two: Blending and Language.

Title in Mandarin

(Ten Lectures on Mind and Language.) 2011. Eminent Linguists Lecture Series. Beijing: FLTR Press. Available from Download free version.

This volume presents transcripts of ten lectures delivered in English at six Beijing universities during May, 2009. Each lecture is preceded by a summary in Chinese.


Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose. 2011. By Francis-Noël Thomas and Mark Turner. Second edition. Princeton University Press. [First edition 1994.] Prix du Rayonnement de la langue et de la littérature françaises, 1996, from the Académie française. Princeton University Press site. Amazon site. Kindle edition.

"The finest book in ages on the neglected subject of rhetoric." —David Skinner, editor, Humanities, The Magazine of the National Endowment of the Humanities

"For the mature student, this is indeed a classic. For the connoisseur, it is indispensable." — Boston Book Review

"Clear and Simple is an island of elegance." — The Editorial Eye.

"Every once in a while a book comes along with the power to alter permanently the view of a subject you thought you knew well. For me this year, that book is Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose." — Denis Dutton, Philosophy and Literature

Meaning, Form, and Body. 2010. Edited and with a preface by Fey Parrill, Vera Tobin, and Mark Turner. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Distributed by the University of Chicago Press. Download the preface.

Both cognitive and functional (or usage-based) approaches share the assumption that language happens within a social and conceptual context, and that grammar is motivated by use. Cognitive approaches force us to confront the fact that language is part of general cognition, while usage-based approaches keep us grounded in the real phenomena of language. Bringing the two approaches together has resulted in powerful demonstrations of the value of taking real language data and building towards a theoretical framework that has explanatory power (witness the success of construction grammar).

The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. 2006. Edited by Mark Turner. With an introduction and a chapter by Mark Turner. New York: Oxford University Press. Kindle edition. Google eBook edition. Oxford University Press page.

"Based on a yearlong research project investigating the artful mind, hosted by Stanford University's Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences, this volume presents some of the latest and most original thinking on the nature of the coevolution of culture and cognition and how humans acquired cognitively modern minds." —Choice

"The Artful full of provocative ideas that suggest avenues for future research.... The book is a great read, and a 'must have' for those interested in creativity, or anyone who has ever wondered what is going on in the mind of the artist or the beholder of an artistic work." —Philosophical Psychology

All normal human beings alive in the last fifty thousand years appear to have possessed irrepressibly artful minds. Cognitively modern minds produced a staggering list of behavioral singularities—science, religion, mathematics, language, advanced tool use, decorative dress, dance, culture, art—that seems to indicate a mysterious and unexplained discontinuity between us and all other living things. This brute fact gives rise to some tantalizing questions: How did the artful mind emerge? What are the basic mental operations that make art possible for us now, and how do they operate? These are the questions that occupy the fourteen contributors to this volume, which emerged from a year-long Getty-funded research project hosted by the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. These scholars bring to bear a range of disciplinary and cross-disciplinary perspectives on the relationship between art (broadly conceived), the mind, and the brain. They offer directions for a new field of research that can play a significant role in answering the great riddle of human singularity.


The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. 2002. By Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner. Basic Books. Kindle edition. Reviewed in The Atlantic Monthly, December 2002. [Polish translation: Warsaw: Fundacja Augusta Hr. Cieszkowskiego, expected July 2015.]

"The definitive introduction to conceptual blending by the two architects of the theory. Highly accessible." — Vyv Evans.

"The Way We Think is a dazzling tour of the complexities of human imagination." — George Lakoff.

During the Upper Paleolithic, human beings developed an unprecedented ability to innovate. They acquired a modern human imagination, which gave them the ability to invent new concepts and to assemble new and dynamic mental patterns. The results of this change were awesome: human beings developed art, science, religion, culture, refined tool use, and language. Our ancestors gained this superiority through the evolution of the mental capacity for conceptual blending. Conceptual blending has a fascinating dynamics and a crucial role in how we think and live. It operates largely behind the scenes. Almost invisibly to consciousness, it choreographs vast networks of conceptual meaning, yielding cognitive products, which, at the conscious level, appear simple. Blending is a process of conceptual mapping and integration that pervades human thought. A mental space is a small conceptual packet assembled for purposes of thought and action. A mental space network connects an array of mental spaces. A conceptual integration network is a mental space network that contains one or more "blended mental spaces." A blended mental space is an integrated space that receives input projections from other mental spaces in the network and develops emergent structure not available from the inputs. Blending operates under a set of constitutive principles and a set of governing principles. The theory of conceptual blending has been applied in cognitive neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology, linguistics, music theory, poetics, mathematics, divinity, semiotics, theory of art, psychotherapy, artificial intelligence, political science, discourse analysis, philosophy, anthropology, and the study of gesture and of material culture.

The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford University Press, 1996. Reviewed in Discover Magazine, March 1997. Oxford University Press presentation. Google eBooks edition.
Kindle edition.

"Written in a crystal-clear style, Turner's book is a triumph of objective literary studies and an example of intelligence, open-mindedness, and intellectual courage." — Modern Philology.

"A book which intends to transform our whole outlook not so much on literature, but on how we think. Turner argues his case with brilliance and tenacity. I for one am convinced." — Denis Dutton, Philosophy and Literature.

"A provocative and stimulating book, a pioneering achievement, nothing short of revolutionary." — General Semiotics.

Named an Outstanding Academic Book of 1997 by Choice.

The modern mind derives from our remarkable capacity to deploy a cohort of basic mental operations—story, projection, blending, and parable. Evolutionarily and developmentally, this mental cohort precedes the human singularities we know as language, art, music, mathematical and scientific discovery, religion, advanced social cognition, refined tool use, advanced music and dance, fashions of dress, and sign systems. This mental cohort makes our higher-order human behaviors possible.

Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science: The Way We Think About Politics, Economics, Law, and Society. Oxford University Press. 2001. Download Chapter Three, "Choice" . Google eBooks edition.
Kindle edition. Oxford University Press presentation.

"A major frontier of the social sciences is to integrate cognitive science with social science. Mark Turner's pioneering study is an imaginative contribution which will, I believe, force social scientists to turn their attention to this frontier." — Douglass C. North, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Economic Science

Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton University Press, 1991.

"[A] brilliant exploration . . . [A] very close and convincing argument. . . Turner's work must be highly recommended. [A] welcome antidote to today's fad of theorizing for theory's sake. . . . What Turner has achieved is important to the study of literature. Indeed, on the present North American scene it seems to be one of the most promising approaches." — Jørgen Dines Johansen. The Semiotic Review of Books

"A solid and original investigation into the theoretical underpinnings of the sciences humaines and an example of a truly interdisciplinary study." —Donald Bruce, Literary Research/ Recherche littéraire

"To those in the profession of literary studies, no task could be more urgent. Works such as [this] form the vanguard of our understanding; from the research front, they signal the presence of new and more fruitful relationships between the sciences and rhetorical and literary studies." — Alan Gross, College English

More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. 1989. By George Lakoff and Mark Turner. University of Chicago Press.

"Likely to be the standard work in metaphor for some time to come." — Donald Freeman, Poetics Today

Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. 1987. University of Chicago Press. Cybereditions eBook or Paperback.

"A study that is exhaustive, richly documented, finely articulated, and extraordinarily broad in the range of knowledge and literary examples that it brings to bear." — Donald Freeman, Poetics Today.

Figurative Language and Thought. 1998. By Cristina Cacciari, Ray Gibbs, Jr., Albert Katz, and Mark Turner. Oxford University Press. [A volume in the series Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language.] Download.

Amalgami: Introduzione ai Network di integrazione concettuale. 2001. By Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner. A cura di Casonato M., Carcione A.,& Procacci M .Urbino: Quattroventi. [A volume in the series Neuroscienze cognitive e psicoterapia.]


L'imagination et la créativité

Other Edited Volumes

Guest Editor, Special feature on “Shakespeare in the Age of Cognitive Science,”(pages 1-131) in the Shakespearean International Yearbook, edited by Graham Bradshaw, Thomas Bishop, and Mark Turner, volume 4, 366 pages. Hants, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004.
Selected Chapters and Articles

Joo, Jungseock, Francis Steen, & Mark Turner. 2017. Red Hen Lab: Dataset and Tools for Multimodal Human Communication Research.  KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. Springer. Special edition edited by Mehul Bhatt & Kristian Kersting. Print ISSN 0933-1875. Online ISSN1610-1987.

Turner, Mark. 2017. Polytropos and Communication in the Wild. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Barbara Dancygier. Pages 93-98.

Turner, Mark. 2017. Conceptual compression and alliterative form. English Language and Linguistics Volume 21, Issue 2. DOI 10.1017/S1360674317000090. Pages 221-226

Turner, Mark. 2017. Multimodal Form-Meaning Pairs for Blended Classic Joint Attention. Linguistics Vanguard. DOI 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0043.

Turner, Mark. 2016. The Performing Mind. In Theatre, Performance, and Cognition: Languages, Bodies, and Ecologies, edited by Rhonda Blair and Amy Cook. Bloomsbury Methuen. Pages 68-74. Flyer with Discount  Download.

Turner, Mark. 2016. "La Integración Conceptual Como Un Programa De Investigación Para La Creatividad Computacional." In Creatividad Computacional, edited by Rafael Pérez y Pérez. Grupo Editorial Patria. ISBN: 978-607-744-284-4. Pages 33-50. Download.

Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal and Mark Turner. 2016. Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction, edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler. John Benjamins. Pages 45-62. Download.

Turner, Mark. 2015. "Blending in Language and Communication," in Dąbrowska, Ewa and Dagmar Divjak, editors, Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. Pages 211-232. Download.

Lucas, Gale, Mathew D. McCubbins, & Mark Turner. 2015. "Against Game Theory." Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences 1-16. John Wiley & Sons. Download.

McCubbins, Mathew D. & Mark Turner. 2014. "Are Individuals Fickle-Minded?" In Zahle, Julie & Finn Collin, editors, Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science. Springer. Pages 237-252.

Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2013. “Multimodal Construction Grammar” in Borkent, Michael, Barbara Dancygier, and Jennifer Hinnell, editors, Language and the Creative Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications/ University of Chicago Press. Pages 255-274. Download.

Turner, Mark. 2013. “Preface” to Ensayos semióticos II. Semiótica e integración conceptual.

McCubbins, Mathew D. & Mark Turner. 2013. “Concepts of Law.” Southern California Law Review. Volume 86, Issue 3, 517-572. Download.

Law depends for its existence and practice upon vast concepts that stretch across time, space, causation, and agency. Vast concepts are fundamental from legislation and interpretation to enforcement and adjudication; from weighing evidence to establishing motive and intent; and from imposing fines or sentences to awarding compensation. But all of human thought and memory is just here and now. Forming and understanding vast legal concepts can be difficult, and failures arise in theory and practice when legal concepts fail to meet certain constraints on intelligibility, congeniality, efficiency, and memorability. We present a model of the formation of legal concepts and some constraints on their practical utility. We also suggest a research agenda that may allow us to better understand what sorts of legal concepts work, and which ones we discard and when.

Nesset, T., A. Endresen, L. Janda, A. Makarova, F. Steen, & M. Turner.  2013.  "How here and now in Russian and English establish joint attention in TV news broadcasts."  Russian Linguistics 37:229–251 DOI 10.1007/s11185-013-9114-x.

This article presents a thorough investigation of the five Russian deictic wordsthat correspond to the English meanings ‘here’ and ‘now’: zdes’, tut, sejčas, teper’ and vot. We analyze data from the Russian National Corpus and data from Russian TV news broadcasts. On the basis of the corpus data, we propose a radial category network consisting of nine subcategories, which encompass all five words, and show that although the deictic words have overlapping distributions, they all have distinct ‘radial category profiles’ in the sense that they display different centers of gravity in the network. We advance the ‘Minimal Adaptation Hypothesis’, according to which language makes adaptations that are as small as possible, when applied to a new setting, such as the one created by TV.

McCubbins, Mathew D., Mark Turner, and Nicholas Weller. 2013. “Testing the Foundations of Quantal Response Equilibrium.” In Greenberg, A. M., Kennedy, W. G., Bos, N. D. (Eds.), Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7812.  Berlin: Springer. Pages 144-153. Download.

Science fiction has explored in many ways the intimate interaction of people with computers. The protagonist in Blade Runner, whose job is to kill replicants, hooks up with one. An acquaintance says to him, "It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does?" Much of the analysis of human decision-making depends upon notions of how people think about each other. But what happens when the other agent in your interdependent decision-making is a computer? We tested that. It is well known that people routinely deviate from Nash equilibrium in making decisions. "Quantal Response Equilibrium" theories propose that people are boundedly rational; that the more costly the deviation from Nash equilibrium, the rarer the deviation will be; and that two main sources of these deviations are social preferences about other people and lack of certainty about how they will behave. We stripped off those two possible sources by having subjects play against computer algorithms that they understood would choose strictly so as to maximize their own earnings in each local task. Our subjects still often deviated from Nash equilibrium. Moreover, the deviations were different for each and every game. Our preliminary conclusion is that QRE is not useful at predicting human behavior, and is of limited use in explaining human behavior across even a small range of highly similar decisions.

Turner, Mark.  2013.  “Iconicity By Blending.”  In Iconicity in Language and Literature, edited by Lars Elleström, Christina Ljungberg, and Olga Fischer.  John Benjamins. Pages 13-24.

Antović, Mihailo, Austin Bennet, and Mark Turner. 2013. “Running in Circles or Moving Along Lines: Conceptualization of Musical Elements in Sighted and Blind Children.” Musicae Scientiae (the Journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music), 17: 229-245.

Turner, Mark. 2012. "Mental Packing and Unpacking in Mathematics." In Mariana Bockarova, Marcel Danesi, and Rafael Núñez, editors, Semiotic and Cognitive Science Articles on the Nature of Mathematics. Munich: Lincom Europa. Interdisciplinary Studies on the Nature of Mathematics 01. Pages 248-267.

McCubbins, Mathew D., Mark Turner and Nicholas Weller. 2012. “The Theory of Minds Within the Theory of Games.” In Arabnia, H. R., de la Fuente, D. Kozerenko, E. G., LaMonica, P. M., Liuzzi, R. A., Olivas, Jose A., Solo, A. M. G., and Waskiewica, T., editors, Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. I. CSREA Press, pages 515-521.Download.

Classical rationality as accepted by game theory assumes that a human chooser in a given moment has consistent preferences and beliefs and that actions result consistently from those preferences and beliefs, and moreover that these preferences, beliefs, and actions remain the same across equal choice moments. Since, as is widely found in prior experiments, subjects do not follow the predictions of classical rationality, behavioral game theorists have assumed consistent deviations from classical rationality by assigning to subjects certain dispositions — risk preference, cognitive abilities, social norms, etc. All of these theories are fundamentally cognitive theories, making claims about how individual human minds work when choosing. All of them are fundamentally wrong in assuming one kind of consistency or another. Or at least, all of the proposals for consistency in belief, preference, and action with which we are aware turn out to be wrong when tested experimentally.

McCubbins, Mathew D. & Turner, Mark. 2012. “Going Cognitive: Tools for Rebuilding the Social Sciences.” In Sun, Ron, ed. Grounding Social Sciences in Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Chapter 14. 387-414. Download.

This chapter is an attempt to provide a few examples of the ways in which routine methods of cognitive science could be applied to improve social scientific investigations concerned with judgment, decision, reason, and choice. Since judgment, decision, reason, and choice are cognitive and conceptual operations, these foundations should draw as much as possible on the best research from cognitive science.

McCubbins, Mathew D., Mark Turner and Nicholas Weller. 2012. “The Mythology of Game Theory.” In Yang, S. J., Greenberg, A., and Endsley, M., editors, Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, & Prediction. Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7227, pages 27-34. Download.

Non-cooperative game theory is at its heart a theory of cognition, specifically a theory of how decisions are made. Game theory's leverage is that we can design different payoffs, settings, player arrays, action possibilities, and information structures, and that these differences lead to different strategies, outcomes, and equilibria. It is well-known that, in experimental settings, people do not adopt the predicted strategies, outcomes, and equilibria. The standard response to this mismatch of prediction and observation is to add various psychological axioms to the game-theoretic framework. Regardless of the differing specific proposals and results, game theory uniformly makes certain cognitive assumptions that seem rarely to be acknowledged, much less interrogated. Indeed, it is not widely understood that game theory is essentially a cognitive theory. Here, we interrogate those cognitive assumptions. We do more than reject specific predictions from specific games. More broadly, we reject the underlying cognitive model implicitly assumed by game theory.

McCubbins, Mathew D., Mark Turner and Nicholas Weller. 2012. “The Challenge of Flexible Intelligence for Models of Human Behavior.” AAAI Spring Symposium Series 2012. Technical Report SS-12-03. pp. 54-60. Available here. Download.

Game theoretic predictions about equilibrium behavior depend upon assumptions of inflexibility of belief, of accord between belief and choice, and of choice across situations that share a game-theoretic structure. However, researchers rarely possess any knowledge of the actual beliefs of subjects, and rarely compare how a subject behaves in settings that share game-theoretic structure but that differ in other respects. Our within-subject experiments utilize a belief elicitation mechanism, roughly similar to a prediction market, in a laboratory setting to identify subjects' beliefs about other subjects' choices and beliefs. These experiments additionally allow us to compare choices in different settings that have similar game-theoretic structure. We find first, as have others, that subjects' choices in the Trust and related games are significantly different from the strategies that derive from subgame perfect Nash equilibrium principles. We show that, for individual subjects, there is considerable flexibility of choice and belief across similar tasks and that the relationship between belief and choice is similarly flexible. To improve our ability to predict human behavior, we must take account of the flexible nature of human belief and choice.

"The Embodied Mind and the Origins of Human Culture." 2011. In Cognition and Culture: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Edited by Ana Margarida Abrantes & Peter Hanenberg. Frankfurt & Berlin: Peter Lang. Pages 13-27. Download.

"The Way We Imagine." 2011. In Theory of Mind and Literature, edited by Paula Leverage, Howard Mancing, Richard Schweickert, and Jennifer Marston William. Purdue University Press. Pages 41-62. [A reprint of an article first published in 2007 in Proceedings of the British Academy 147, 213–236.]

In The Way We Think (2002), Gilles Fauconnier and I proposed that the basic mental operation of conceptual integration, also known as "blending," has been present and evolving in various species for a long time. Modern human beings evolved not an entirely different kind of mind, but instead the capacity for the strongest form of conceptual integration, known as "double-scope" or "vortex" blending. It is the engine of human imagination.

“Conceptual Blending.” 2010. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 194-197.

“Parable.” 2010. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 580-581.

“De Rerum Natura: Dragons of Obliviousness and the Science of Social Ontology.” 2009. In Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, edited by Chrysostomos Mantzavinos. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 28-40.

Social science would be easier if each aspect of higher-order human cognition operated independently of the others. Then we could treat human behavior as a linear sum of partitioned categories of performance. John Searle has shed light on how this model fails for language and social ontology, leading us to mistake rehearsing tautologies for doing science. I assert that this failure is general across a great range of aspects of higher-order human performance—language being only one of them—and present a theory of their relations.

"The Scope of Human Thought." 2009. On the Human. An on-line forum published by the National Humanities Center. Target article with commentary by other researchers and a response from the author.

Biologically, we resemble other animals, but mentally, we leave them in the dust. The scope of human thought is vast. Why are we so different?

"Signs of Intelligent Life." 2009. Signs and Meaning: Five Questions. Edited by Peer Bundgaard and Frederik Stjernfelt. New York: Automatic Press/VIP. Pages 257-271. Download.

Human beings are, in their behavior, and especially in their ubiquitous creativity, dramatically unlike members of other species, despite the genetic and anatomical similarities. We create symbolic systems, signs, and new meaning. How can our distinctive ability to do so be explained?

"The Mind is an Autocatalytic Vortex." 2008. In The Literary Mind, Volume 24 (2008) of REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, edited by Jürgen Schlaeger. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag. December, 2008. Download.

Blending is indispensable for advanced narrative cognition. In The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language (1996), I argued that the modern mind derives from our remarkable capacity to deploy a cohort of basic mental operations—story, projection, blending, and parable. These operations are a pack, a troupe, a self-feeding cyclone, an autocatalytic vortex, a breeder reactor, a dynamic heterarchy—choose your metaphor: they labor together. Some of the evidence I presented in The Literary Mind can be misinterpreted, it seems, as suggesting that advanced narrative cognition comes first in the sequence, and that upon this rock the other operations build their conceptual church. My purpose here is to correct that misinterpretation. Mature narrative cognition does not exist without blending. Blending is not a second step.

"The Origin of Language as a Product of the Evolution of Double-Scope Blending." 2008. (With Gilles Fauconnier.) Commentary, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Further work on the origin of language as derivative of the origin of double-scope conceptual integration. Based on chapter 9 of The Way We Think.

"The Origin of Language as a Product of the Evolution of Modern Cognition." (With Gilles Fauconnier.) 2008. In Laks, Bernard, et al., editors, Origin and Evolution of Languages: Approaches, Models, Paradigms. London: Equinox. Download.

Further work on the origin of language as derivative of the origin of double-scope conceptual integration. Based on chapter 9 of The Way We Think.

Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner. 2008. "Rethinking Metaphor." 2008. In Ray Gibbs, editor, Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 53-66. Download. Cambridge Books Online.

"What are We?: The Convergence of Self and Communications Technology." 2008. In Integration and Ubiquity: Towards a Philosophy of Telecommunications Convergence, edited by Kristóf Nyíri. Vienna: Passagen Verlag. 21-28. Download.

Because telecommunications technologies are built to be used at human scale, they provide powerful potential inputs to blended notions of self. It is not that these telecommunications technologies are blurring the boundaries of the self; rather, they are making it possible for us to have certain human-scale conceptions of self.

"Frame Blending." 2008. In Frames, Corpora, and Knowledge Representation, edited by Rema Rossini Favretti. Bologna: Bononia University Press. 13-32. Download.

"The Way We Imagine." 2007. In Ilona Roth, editor, Imaginative Minds. Proceedings of the British Academy. London: Oxford University Press & the British Academy. [Proceedings of the British Academy 147, 213–236.] Pdf of draft.

"The Art of Compression" in The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Edited by Mark Turner. Oxford University Press, October 2006. Zipped pdf version.

"Compression and Representation." 2006. Language and Literature. 15:1, 17-27. Download.

"Conceptual Integration" in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

"Mathematics and Narrative". Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics and Narrative, Thales & Friends, Mykonos, Greece, 12-15 July 2005. Pdf version.

"The Literal versus Figurative Dichotomy" in The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought. Edited by Seana Coulson and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2005. Pages 25-52. Excerpt with modifications from a chapter in Figurative Language and Thought. Download.

"The Ghost of Anyone's Father." Shakespearean International Yearbook. Edited by Graham Bradshaw, Thomas Bishop , and Mark Turner. Volume 4. Hants, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004, pages 72-97. Part of a special section on “Shakespeare in the Age of Cognitive Science,” guest editor, Mark Turner. Download.

"Double-scope stories." In Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, edited by David Herman. Stanford: CSLI, 2003, pages 117-142. Download. [Translation into Polish: "Opowieści amalgamatyczne." Translated by Jarosław Płuciennik.  Teksty Drugie 2010:4 (124), 137-150.]

"The origin of selkies." Journal of Consciousness Studies, volume 11 (2004), numbers 5-6: pages 90-115. Download.

"Polysemy and Conceptual Blending." (With Gilles Fauconnier.) In Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language. Edited by Brigitte Nerlich, Vimala Herman, Zazie Todd, and David Clarke. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003: 79-94. A volume in the series Trends in Linguistics. Download.

"L'intégration conceptuelle." La Lettre du Collège de France. Number 6. October 2002.

"Literacy and Cognition" in Reading Between the Lines: New Perspectives on Foreign Language Literacy, edited by Peter C. Patrikis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003, pages 24-39.

"The Dynamics of Seduction." Apparatur: Tidsskrift for litteratur og kulturr 4:2. August, 2002. Odense, Denmark. pp. 20-22. (ISSN1601-5576)

"Toward the Founding of Cognitive Social Science." The Chronicle of Higher Education. 5 October 2001.

Review of Leonard Talmy, Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Two volumes. In Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 576-578, 2002. Download.

"Backstage Cognition in Reason and Choice." In Arthur Lupia, Mathew McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin, editors, Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, Summer 2000. Pages 264-286. Download.

"Compression and global insight." (With Gilles Fauconnier.) Cognitive Linguistics 11:3-4 (2000), pages 283-304. Download.

"Conceptual Integration Networks". (With Gilles Fauconnier). Cognitive Science. Volume 22, number 2 (April-June 1998), pages 133-187. Download Expanded Version. [Download original article]

"Metaphor, Metonymy, and Binding". 2003. (With Gilles Fauconnier). In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Edited by Antonio Barcelona. Mouton de Gruyter, in press. A volume in the series Topics in English Linguistics.

"Forging Connections." In Computation for Metaphor, Analogy, and Agents. Edited by Chrystopher Nehaniv. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pages 11-26. A volume in the series Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Download.

"A Mechanism of Creativity" (with Gilles Fauconnier). Poetics Today. Volume 20, number 3 (Fall 1999), pages 397-418. [Reprinted as "Life on Mars: Language and the Instruments of Invention." In The Workings of Language, edited by Rebecca Wheeler. Praeger, 1999. Pages 181-200.] Download.

"Conceptual Integration in Counterfactuals" (With Gilles Fauconnier). Discourse and Cognition. Edited by Jean-Pierre Koenig, et al. Stanford: CSLI, 1998, 285-296. Download.

"Principles of Conceptual Integration" (With Gilles Fauconnier). Discourse and Cognition. Edited by Jean-Pierre Koenig, et al. Stanford: CSLI, 1998, 269-283.

"Conceptual Blending and Counterfactual Argument in the Social and Behavioral Sciences." 1996. In Philip Tetlock and Aaron Belkin, editors, Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996, 291-295. Download.

"Poetry for the Newborn Brain." [A commentary on Terrence Deacon, The Symbolic Species.] 1998. Bostonia, Spring, Number 1, 72-73. Download.

"Cognitive Science and Literary Theory." Stanford Humanities Review. 4:1 Supplement. (Spring 1994), 110-112.

"Blending as a Central Process of Grammar." (with Gilles Fauconnier) in Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Edited by Adele Goldberg. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), 1996. Download expanded version.

"Design for a Theory of Meaning" in The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning. Edited by W. F. Overton and D. S. Palermo. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.

"Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces." (With Gilles Fauconnier.) UCSD Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. April 1994. Download.

"Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression." (With Gilles Fauconnier). Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, volume 10, number 3 (1995), pages 183-203. Download.

"Language is a Virus." Poetics Today 13:4 (Winter 1992), 725-736. Download.

"As Imagination Bodies Forth the Forms of Things Unknown." Review of Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., The Poetics of Mind. In Pragmatics and Cognition, 3:1 (1995) 179-185. Download.

"Propertius Through the Looking Glass: A Fragmentary Glance at the Construction of Pound's Homage." Paideuma. 5:2 (1976), 241-265. Download.

Working Papers


"Blending Box Experiments, Build 1.0." 23 January 2010. Download.

This working paper concerns a central human mental ability: the ability to blend two different conceptual arrays so as to produce an emergent outcome in the blend. The centrality of this mental operation is widely and robustly confirmed by the empirical data. But as far as I have found, there are no tests proposed in the literature to detect the presence or to measure the extent of this ability across the human lifespan (development, maturity, senescence), or under deficit (post-stroke or trauma), or across members of other species (mammalian, aviary). This working paper sketches some of the difficulties encountered in trying to devise such a test. These difficulties have not yet been surmounted. No completely worthy test has yet been found.

Blending Box Experiments
Click image to play movie
in a new window


Cognitive Science in North Africa. 7 December 2010.

Newspaper Logo

The New Evolutionary Enlightenment. 30 September 2009.

"Cognitive Linguistics." Desde el Exilo. 30 September 2009.